Get Yours Today!

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:41:41 -0700

Shameless of me I know, but I was really happy with how these turned out so I decided to share them with you all. I designed these from photographs I've taken of the letters of the alphabet. And from these I've uploaded the images and had a line of t-shirts, etc made on cafepress.com

Obama plain

Obama 2008

Check this out: http://www.cafepress.com/carmenrose

That's where you can view the clothing options with the above designs on them. Here are two examples I liked:

Obama shirt

Organic cotten obama tee

Send to a friend

I'm a fan, what can I say?!

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Wed, 14 May 2008 06:19:27 -0700

What we can draw from Obama

And they said he was unprepared

It could happen to you

Playground Politics

Send to a friend

Check it out

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Thu, 01 May 2008 06:16:45 -0700

Obama on gas prices

I think this is a very reasonable approach to rising gas prices. And kudos to Obama for communicating effectively AGAIN! My... he is fine!

Send to a friend

Why do the Democrats eat their own? (Or Why Rev Jeremiah Wright gets it Wrong.)

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:51:46 -0700

I have followed the Rev Jeremiah Wright story a little bit. I don’t watch much in the way of network news so I’ve missed *some* of the flurry of sound bytes. I spent some time on YouTube watching some of Rev Wright’s speeches in full. Not just the ten second bytes. I am no expert on this man but I have felt very sympathetic toward him, thrust as he has been, into a spotlight he didn’t ask for. Well, he doesn’t seem to mind it really, now does he?!

I’ve heard his recent comments quoted on NPR. A few interesting tidbits include references to the tragic Tuskegee Syphilis Study. And something about AIDS being caused by the US government. And a few other things that I’ve also heard from economically challenged members of the black community. Considered opinions as to the injustice of the US government toward her own people. Are these opinions widely held? It would seem so. And I sympathize. When something is widely perceived as truth, the actual truth is of little consequence. But when these things are said in the light of day with a white audience, people get a little shocked. And perhaps rightly so. I’ve been very surprised the whole time this story ran, wondering how it ever got to the air waves.

Here’s the thing I find most unsettling. Obama has denounced Rev Wright in the strongest possible terms. Yet the good Rev has only articulated what many Afro-American’s believe. And here is a charming black pastor, who seems to be saying in effect “Come on Obama, fess up! We all know you agree with me.” It’s almost as if Rev Wright is defining what it means to be a Black, Christian, and Democrat in America. It’s as if Obama has crossed the line and there is the good Reverend calling him back into the fold. No thanks! I didn’t like it when the Republicans told us what it meant to be White and Christian (backed by Reverands Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell) and I don’t like it now. (There is more to leadership than being AGAINST some things.)

The good Rev Wright is Wrong. If there is a possibility that a good man, who happens to be Christian and Democrat can make a difference in the future of this country and begin to be a positive change against that injustice that angers those with a conscience… If someone could take the power in Washington out of the hands of the wealthy few and put it into the hands of the people… If decency and compassion could be seen as signs of integrity rather than weakness… If the blood-letting of the Iraq war could come to a close… If one man has the audacity to hope, and more than a million contributors share this audacity... If any of these things could be seen on the horizon in American politics, wouldn’t it just be time to take your wounded pride, sit down and shut up?!

No, this is the land of free speech. We don’t keep silence here. Hate speech, inappropriate speech, stupid speech, lewd language, not to mention propaganda and spin. Our speech may be free but amongst all the babble the truth is increasingly difficult to find.

Send to a friend

Our Uncommon next Social Worker in Chief

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:08:52 -0700

A More Perfect Union. A speech by Barack Obama. I haven’t followed this story closely, but I am curious and perplexed about how Obama’s pastor has become a big news story and how this story has lingered in the news as long as it has.

I’ve listened to a few of the sound bytes taken from sermons by Pastor Wright. I see a man speaking from his heart and his perspective. Fully informed by his world view and his study of the scripture this man is speaking of injustices in this world. And in the process of expressing himself he chose language that would over-state his thoughts and ideas. Language that would confront, offend and challenge the listener. Language that would prod and pound our casual approach to injustice in this country. This language is as indelicate and unsalted as some Old Testament prophets. His words offend our shamelessness about treatment of the first nation of Native Americans, dropping the atom bombs, and much more. Yeah, I think he crosses the line in his approach, but I don’t think the ideas themselves are as extreme as they appear in a 10 second sound byte on FOX news. He makes the point that the events of September 11^th came as a result of reaping what American foreign policy has sown into the earth. I dare say that there are plenty of Americans who would agree with that point to some degree. It certainly is not a new idea, there are plenty who have made exactly this point for a long time. It’s a point I find difficult to disagree with. So why this reaction in the media?

Is it because this man is a preacher? Uh… has anyone heard that old preacher that is a close friend of the Bush family, let’s see… what is his name? You know the one, he suggested that Venezuela’s president be assassinated. Now that is an interesting foreign policy! That is just one excellent example out of many comments that are overstatements of things many believe. And that came from Bush family friend Old whats-his-name Pat Robertson. While many Americans may agree that Chavez is an inconvenience to American interests and a thorn in the side, certainly very few agreed with the overstated idea that the leader of a sovereign nation be killed by U.S. agents. We’re used to these sorts of things from Pat Robertson, so why is it such a big deal when the same kind of overblown rhetoric shows up from a black preacher? So he went a little “Malcolm X” in the pulpit and it was captured on tape. Which is perfect for those who like to trade in the politics of fear. Maybe it is all about race and fear of a (justifiably) angry black man. Especially one who suggests that God (that Ultimate Super Power) ain’t that thrilled about how we’ve been treating the poor and the powerless down here on this little windy hot marble. So which is it? Communication? Fear? Race? Religion?

So I listened carefully to Obama’s speech on race in America. At first I was distracted by the fact that the stage was draped in – count um – EIGHT American flags. Come on! Doesn’t THE American flag say enough? Isn’t this the equivalent of stars and stripes shouting? Then I saw a quick blurb from Hillary standing in front of THREE! Apparently it’s all the rage these days. Multiple flags just in case anyone was wondering exactly how American these candidates are. (Obama is apparently ahead in this regard as well.) I guess if one is good...

Once I got past the visual of the one lone figure draped in the stars and stripes... I gave some consideration to his speech. It was long. Too long. But it wasn't about race. Or at least not only. It was about race and power, injustice, opportunity, religion, faith, pessimism, despair, fear and hope. Yeah, we come back to that last one. Hope.

Obama provided a context for understanding Pastor Wright’s words. It reminded me of my days in Social Work classes in college. He recapped history for those of us who seem to forget – because we don’t live in the same world with the same kinds of privilege (or lack of.) How could I with my blone hair and ultra pastel skin understand the privilege that is mine for reasons that have nothing to do with me? I thought he did an excellent job of laying out a framework for working to improve life in America for those who are underprivileged, underemployed with sub standard health care. For Americans of any race. And I was impressed with him again.

For me it’s about judgment. In my opinion Obama showed good judgment in voting against the war in Iraq back when it was political suicide. History continues to prove that he chose right. This most recent bout of audacious hope for working toward “a more perfect union” is further evidence of Obama’s judgment. There is a fine line between condemning and betraying a friend in the process of distancing yourself from a man’s political opinions while still honoring his friendship and personal and spiritual history with the Obama family. No doubt it won't feel so kind to Pastor Wright, nevertheless I think Obama did a good job of handling that delicate balancing act. As a matter of fact, it didn’t sound at all like a politician’s speech to me. I’ve never heard a candidate speak that profoundly honestly about race in America. Even Clinton who was our first black President. LOL! But then Senator Obama is no ordinary candidate.

My hat is off to the tall thin guy in front of the eight flags. He’d make an excellent Social Worker in Chief. An uncommon man for an uncommon time in history. Yes indeedy!

Send to a friend

He continues to impress!

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:57:42 -0800

Don't tell me words don't matter

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Womb Politics

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:10:08 -0800

I am not one of those people who vote on one issue alone, but this afternoon I gave some thought and research to the subject of abortion. If I were to vote according to this one issue, where would my vote go? Where do the candidates stand on the issues when it comes to the issue of protecting the life of the unborn?

Predictably, Republicans McCain, Romney and Huckabee believe that Roe V Wade should be overturned. Obama clearly states that the government should not make abortion choices for women; the mother and her community are best suited to make those difficult decisions. And Clinton supports making abortion safe, legal and rare.

These are complex issues. I agree with Obama that the government should not be in the business of telling birth families what choice is right for them since the government can not foretell the situation a woman finds herself in. I agree with McCain that the government should not be providing funding for abortion services. I agree with Huckabee that parents should be notified when an underage girl chooses to abort her baby. And finally, I agree with McCain, Romney and Huckabee that the Partial Birth Abortion Ban should be supported. And I'm impressed by Clinton's long record of successful proactive work to reduce and prevent unwanted pregnancies through education.

I would like to see more women chose adoption over abortion and I believe that adoption should be part of the abortion debate. It's not just a question of whether or not to have an abortion - it's a question of what is best for the child. I think the government should support both the birth parents and the adoptive family in the choice to adopt. Given the rates of infertility in this country, having a proactive approach to adoption is simply good politics and very much an addition to the “right to life” debate.

I am glad that Clinton has supported making the adoption credit increase permanent and has also worked to increase adoptions from foster care. McCain, who has an adopted daughter, has also voted to make the adoption credit increase permanent. Romney is in favor of making the adoption credit increase permanent, and is working to raise awareness about embryonic adoption, or snowflake babies. In a world where every little bit counts, these are fantastic!

I think Clinton has taken the edge off of her full tilt pro-abortion stance through her record on proactive measures to reduce the number of babies potentially aborted through education as well as her record on increasing adoption from foster care. Her actions and her words agree, she wants abortion "safe, legal and rare."

Huckabee is the candidate of the religious right, and is “actively and aggressively pro-life” but a full tilt anti-abortion stance is incomplete without proactive measures to reduce unwanted pregnancies in the first place. Saying “don’t have sex” just doesn’t work. What is missing in his campaign material is his full support for the adoption option so a child can find his or her forever family. It is not enough to tell a country that there will be no more abortions and then do nothing about the alternatives to abortion.

Various candidates make a number of mistakes in my opinion. I understand Obama’s nuanced views on abortion but I believe his mistake is the omission of adoption from his plan. And Clinton and Huckabee overshoot the issue with Clinton’s plan to make Roe V Wade into federal law and Huckabee’s plan for a right to life amendment to the constitution.

After weighing the pros and cons of abortion politics in the current race - I think McCain or Romney have the most moderate and well reasoned stance on this issue. And if I were to vote on this issue alone, either of these men would have my vote. Which is interesting because that is not what I would have said before I did the research.

Have you done your research?

I started here:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.abortion.html

And also visited:

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4891

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/family/

http://obama.senate.gov/issues/

http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm

http://www.mittromney.com/News/Press-Releases/Romney_Agenda_10.26.07

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=11

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Worth Repeating... Yes We Can

nobody@vox.com(Artzy Carmen) — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:09:14 -0800

Yes We Can

I’ve seen this video four or five times over the last few days and I was and continue to be really impressed by it. Very impressive indeed! Artistically, it’s beautifully created. And the collection of elements reminds me of listening to the old recordings of Martin Luther King’s speeches, or an old black preacher with the congregation on the edge of their seats. The use of language is beautiful, and the positive message is perfectly flawless. Bravo! Certainly this video is as much propaganda as any other political message but it is a departure from the tone in the political scene in recent years, and for that I must tip my hat!

I’ve grown so tired of the argumentative tone, the strident defensiveness and the general disrespectful delivery of speeches from the current administration. Add in the wholesale slaughter of the language, an inability to see fact from fiction, and indefensible positions on issues that do and don’t matter to the American people, and I arrive at an impatience for it to all be over. A new chapter is certainly in order. Most completely! It is time for change.

And for a full text of the video visit Kelly’s blog where the whole thing is written out for a slower digestion. (It works well slowly also!) Good stuff! I think it is also worth noting that this video was only posted on Feb 2nd on YouTube and has already been viewed well over a million times, been favorited by over 6,000 people and gotten well over 5,000 comments. So clearly this work is touching a grassroots nerve... it touched me anyway.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend